My research investigates the impact of neurobiological discourse on contemporary thought, examining how neuroscience reinforces modes of social reproduction that are linked to how we suffer. At the same time, I position psychoanalysis as a possible antagonist to these paradigms and epistemologies.
I do not work within the frameworks of psychiatry, neuropsychiatry, or psychological diagnosis. The work carried out in analysis is grounded in speech and discourse.
The disciplines that inform Lacanian analysis include anthropology, linguistics, gender studies, philosophy, mathematics, logic, history, and the philosophy of science.
Drawing from a structural and topological reading of Lacan, I explore how psychoanalysis can subvert prevailing notions of subjectivity by shifting from a logic of self-enclosed individuals to one of "Inmixing of Otherness." This approach intersects with philosophy and critical theory, challenging the reduction of human experience to biology and advocating for a psychoanalysis that engages with the impossibilities, conflicts, and social links that shape subjectivity.